KEEPING
LIVERPOOL-NORWICH
NorthernTPE franchise consultation
Question STP4
Other
Manchester-Sheffield options
The nation-building
Liverpool-Norwich express train service should be retained as a through route
and further developed, not broken up.
Breaking up
Liverpool-Norwich would be bad for the taxpayer, bad for business and academia,
bad for tourism and bad for the less mobile. Further development is the right
way forward.
Liverpool-Norwich shows
continued strong growth. Several times in the past few years, Liverpool-Norwich
has achieved a passenger satisfaction score of 93%.
Breaking up Liverpool-Norwich would be bad for the taxpayer.
Replacing the through service with
shuttles at the same frequency would require more vehicles. So costs would
rise.
At the same time, some passengers would
desert the railway if their journey involved an extra change of train. So
earnings would be less than if the through service continued.
The Department for Transport wants a “common
standard” across all services between Manchester and Sheffield; it could
achieve that by specifying it.
Breaking up Liverpool-Norwich would be bad for business and academia.
Grantham, Norwich, Peterborough and
Thetford are all government-designated Growth Points. Tens of thousands of
homes are planned in the Fens, in Suffolk and around Cambridge, from which
people drive into Ely to catch the Liverpool trains. The Liverpool-Norwich
train service helps attract businesses, skilled workers and professionals to
these towns, offering both easy business travel, perhaps to “head office”, and
the opportunity to visit friends or leisure destinations. Good transport links
help business productivity, particularly when they provide good access into
city centres and between cities. Liverpool, Manchester, Peterborough, Sheffield
and Warrington stations are all in central locations.
Undergraduates are the nation’s future.
Through trains make the universities in Norwich easily accessible to both
students and visiting academics from Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield while
providing more effective choice of where to study for those living east of
Nottingham.
Breaking up Liverpool-Norwich would be bad for tourism.
Tourism is a significant part of the
economy east of Nottingham with resorts and councils seeking to enhance their
all-year short-beak offer. Not only does Liverpool-Norwich allow visitors to
travel easily, comfortably and sustainably from Liverpool, Manchester and
Sheffield but it ensures hourly exposure of the five towns east of Nottingham
on station screens and announcements in three of England’s biggest cities.
Breaking up Liverpool-Norwich would be bad for the less mobile.
Britain has an ageing population and
Norwich was the “senior railcard capital” of the former Central Trains. There
are many people living east of Nottingham who have family connections with the
big cities further west. Comfortable, reliable and convenient through trains
allow them to keep in personal contact, improving their quality of live and
well-being. If the route is broken up, some might continue to travel by train,
perhaps booking assistance at stations where they will have to change. Others
would have to be fetched by car or stay at home.
Further development is the right way forward.
Recent improvements include a 0651
business express from Norwich, extension to Norwich of the 1352 from Liverpool,
fewer cancellations, 2500 extra seats a day west of Nottingham, CCTV and
cleaner stainless steel toilets.
Our vision is of reliable, clean and
comfortable trains with high levels of customer service, so we see a need for a
“whole route” approach to engineering access as a step towards a seven-day
railway with trains on Sundays during university terms a priority, a constant
focus on minimising cancellations, mid-journey cleaning on all trains
travelling the full length of the route, effective air-conditioning, working
even in hot weather and regular reviews of the balance between seats and
luggage space.
We welcome the provision of catering between
Liverpool and Nottingham and the catering trial further east, which must be
reliable to be commercially viable.
Our vision is of accurate real-time
information for passengers at all times, so we warmly welcome the ongoing
replacement of temperamental public address equipment on the trains and see a
need for ensuring that coach identification gadgets are always correctly used
on trains which divide at Nottingham and for adding information to screens and
station announcements west of Nottingham on which comes come through to
Norwich.
Our vision is of welcoming stations,
where facilities meet or exceed all government targets for their size. The
performance of station facility operators in providing toilets, waiting rooms
and retail advice at the specified times needs to be robustly monitored and
challenged.
There could now be a case for looking
closely at the facilities which attract and support business travel. We should
like to see more trains via Grantham travel between Nottingham and Norwich in a
car-competitive 160 minutes or less.
22 June 2014